Nomination Clarification #3

[hurtcomfortexmod]

Relationships -

Please move the relationship to the front of the tag or indicate if these are supposed to be a polycule

Star Wars - All Media Types
Enric Pryde & Brooks & Brendol Hux & Snoke/Armitage Hux (hurt Armitage Hux)

Star Wars (Marvel Comics)
Ben Solo | Kylo Ren & Snoke & Knights of Ren/Armitage Hux (hurt Hux)
Ben Solo | Kylo Ren & Snoke & Knights of Ren/Armitage Hux (hurt Kylo)
Enric Pryde & Brooks & Brendol Hux/Armitage Hux (hurt Armitage Hux)

Should it be
Snoke/Armitage Hux & Brendol Hux & Brooks & Enric Pryde
or
(Enric Pryde & Brooks & Brendol Hux & Snoke)/Armitage Hux

?

Freeforms

[Blank] to Lovers - Casual/Unromantic Sex Leads to Unwanted Feelings - Please fill in the Blank, doctor-patient to lovers or enemies to lovers or study buddies to lovers are all different enough that the tag is too broad.

Too broad, is this a hurt or a comfort? Please edit or clarify the hurt or comfort in the comments.

Soulmate-Identifying Marks

Immortality

Nonsexual Ageplay

Robot/Human Relationships

Goddesses

Friendship/Love

Kid Fic

Genetically Engineered Beings

Families of Choice

Orphans

Alternate Universe - Everyone Lives/Nobody Dies

Fire Magic

Fix-It

Homunculi

Power Exchange

Sex Work


Unclear

Body worship to assert equality (Please explain the assert equality part? Just Body worship would be fine)

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Hi! I'm not the Star Wars nominator but I want to make sure I understand the clarification because it relates to something I want to nominate and this isn't covered in the nomination guidelines. My understanding of this clarification is:

A/B/C (hurt A)

- This is a valid tag as indicated in the guidelines
- It's asking for A, B, and C to all be in a romantic relationship with each other in an even fashion.

A/B & C (hurt A)

- This is a valid tag as indicated by this clarification post.
- It's asking for A and B to be in a romantic/sexual relationship and for them to have a gen relationship with C

(C & B)/A (hurt A)

- This is a valid tag as indicated by this clarification post.
- It's asking for C and B to both be in a romantic relationship with A, but not with each other.

Is that correct? Could you update the nomination guidelines post? I didn't realize that A/B & C nominations were allowed and in previous exchanges I think I've see A/B & A/C used instead of (C & B)/A, so I wouldn't have known to nominate them like that either...

[tehexile]

i've tried to clarify/word better some of mine

[hobbitdragon]

I nominated Power Exchange and Nonsexual Ageplay! Both are meant as comfort/healing portions of the hurt/comfort dynamic. So if we're gonna make them more specific, I guess I could say "Power Exchange to Assist Self-Care" and "Nonsexual Ageplay to Heal Childhood Trauma".

[(Anonymous)]

I nominated Body worship to assert equality, and I was thinking of a canon where a master/servant relationship is enforced from above. The master is forced to continue treating their beloved as a servant in public which causes a lot of canonical angst on both sides.

[thisbluespirit]

Just to let you know that at the moment you have, under TV, both "Doctor Who" and "Doctor Who (2005)" as separate categories (with different relationships) and it should be one or the other. All of the rels under the "Doctor Who" tag are from 2005 anyway - as follows:

Amy Pond/Vincent van Gogh (hurt Vincent)
The Doctor's TARDIS & Rose Tyler (hurt Rose)
Metacrisis Tenth Doctor/Rose Tyler (hurt Doctor)
Metacrisis Tenth Doctor/Rose Tyler (hurt Rose)
Rose Tyler & Jack Harkness (hurt Rose)